Some package managers can create lists of packages that look for funding, e.g. https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v8/commands/npm-fund https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v8/com

Some package managers can create lists of packages that look for funding, e.g. https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v8/commands/npm-fund https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v8/commands/npm-fund This way you can show your employer which modules they rely on. Not all open source projects/authors look for funding, for idealistic purpose, easier not to deal with tax implications or they want to stay independent and avoid "We sponsor you, why didn't you implement feature X?" situations. > Are Github sponsors or a Patreon style model a good approach? As company I want to minimize the number of monthly invoices so this centralization has a benefit. We https://opencollective.com/ https://opencollective.com/ as well.