> He believes the only reason companies avoid AGPL is the extra paperwork burden it causes. Maybe I’m the one misreading it, but isn’t the author saying that

> He believes the only reason companies avoid AGPL is the extra paperwork burden it causes. Maybe I’m the one misreading it, but isn’t the author saying that the reason to avoid dual-licensed (e.g. AGPL and commercial) software is the paperwork burden for the commercial license? Going with your Google example, I think there would be no issue as Google would not be using the software under AGPL, but under a commercial license instead.