If you're willing to effectively penalize people for making lifestyle choices, why not also cut salaries for people without kids? Or people with spouses with go

If you're willing to effectively penalize people for making lifestyle choices, why not also cut salaries for people without kids? Or people with spouses with good jobs? They don't need the extra cash. This sounds like a deal you'd offer a co-founder, not an employee. I'm sure Peldi's intentions are good here but from a potential employee's point of view I don't see why anything but the quality of my work should determine my salary.