So, in essence, I think you're saying that you choose a license depending on your goals for a project. Which seems reasonable. More reasonable than folks who r

So, in essence, I think you're saying that you choose a license depending on your goals for a project. Which seems reasonable. More reasonable than folks who release under a license, then complain when others do exactly what the license allows. I see a lot of "but give nothing back" complaints from some open source folk, but I've looked hard and I don't see a "give something back" clause anywhere, at least not in the licenses I'm using. What I do see are "give something forward" clauses, which explicitly target customers, not suppliers. I like and use open source as much as the next guy, but for my day job I code for money. Alas so far Open Source pays no bills.