Got any references? Any links? How many of these projects have failed because their moderation failed, because Greater Fuckwad theory took over? This is pushin

Got any references? Any links? How many of these projects have failed because their moderation failed, because Greater Fuckwad theory took over? This is pushing into far off frontier territory, but I see few real options about it, so I'll lay down my cards. We need social web protocols[1], as a groundwork for innovation, for trying different things, for different folk making ongoing progress towards their own success. That diversity is the only hope we have of revealing greater wider paths. It doesn't have to be these particular protocols cited, but open, interoperable social is the basis where we can start to formulate ideas of moderation & response. You've made a lot of gesticulartion that we've tried a lot, but frankly, I have a hard time pinning down any of your various "we've tried this, it's no good" naysaying shitthrowing to any particular sites, and just one site failing seems to mean a lot to you, but it means very little to me. I don't see that you have even the faintest remotest appreciation for how much exploration & possibility is open. This attitude that connectivity is all a-priori doomed to fail is shit, is weak, is cowardice. Fuck this x1000. I don't think we've started to try, your protests give me no evidence to the counter. (editor note: why you got downvoted on your last reply is shit. downvoting is such a stupid plague. nothing you've said is bad or wrong.) [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/social-web-protocols/ https://www.w3.org/TR/social-web-protocols/