5 ms·
Upwork is a red herring in this case. As frustrating as it may be that Upwork wasn't more helpful in resolving this case, the current state of affairs is as fol
by educaysean 5y ago
Upwork is a red herring in this case. As frustrating as it may be that Upwork wasn't more helpful in resolving this case, the current state of affairs is as follows:
1. The author (freelancer) did $12.5k amount of work that he wasn't compensated for
2. The owner of the CC that was "accidentally" charged $12.5k received all their money back through bank dispute
3. Upwork was able to claim their cut for the $12.5k worth of transaction that occurred between the author and Robin
4. Robin received $12.5k amount of work without paying a dime
Robin needs to pay the author back the $12.5k he is owed. If Upwork isn't willing to help reclaim the debt, he needs to sue Robin directly for the amount. It's very strange how much good will the author is willing to show towards Robin given how Robin is the only entity in the story who got away with all the spoils without paying a thing.
- vorpalhex 5y agoUpwork is the merchant of record. Robin did, fraudalantly pay - to Upwork. Upwork took their cut, and paid out to the freelancer. Upwork discovers Robin's fraud. Guess what? This is why upwork gets a 30% cut. Upwork gets to deal with that.