3 ms·
It's too bad the rendering didn't include timestamps. For example, is that a year of data in 25s of rendering, or the last few months?
by boulos 5y ago
It's too bad the rendering didn't include timestamps. For example, is that a year of data in 25s of rendering, or the last few months?
- tablespoon 5y ago> It's too bad the rendering didn't include timestamps. For example, is that a year of data in 25s of rendering, or the last few months? Per the OP: > However, this novel detection of bright radiation coming from a red supergiant in the final year before exploding suggests that at least some of these stars must undergo significant changes in their internal structure that then results in the tumultuous ejection of gas moments before they collapse. I think this is probably the period from 5s to 12s in the animation.
- boulos 5y agoYes, probably but it'd be nice to know. Even the start of the rendering though seems to have some gas being ejected that I was curious about ("Is that the start of the process at 1 year out?"). I dunno, maybe an improved caption would be enough.