3 ms·
>0.3% is the case only after torturing statistics Ironic, since a 0.3% (or 0.6%) fatality rate is vastly exaggerated for people in low risk groups. The only re
by yucky 5y ago
>0.3% is the case only after torturing statistics
Ironic, since a 0.3% (or 0.6%) fatality rate is vastly exaggerated for people in low risk groups. The only reason the number is even that high is due to the high death tolls of people in high risk groups.
- javagram 5y agoThat is how averages work. One could equally point out that 0.6% IFR actually underestimated the risk for some adults. Many people shared Facebook memes of a “99.9%” survival rate not understanding that they personally were at greater risk than that. This page was available on the CDC website for quite a long time explaining the different risks in a pretty straightforward table https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/investigations-discovery/hospitalization-death-by-age.html https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/investi...
- giraffe_lady 5y ago> The only reason the number is even that high is due to the high death tolls of people in high risk groups. The only reason the fatality rate is that high is because people died? What are you trying to say here? What else would it measure?
- yucky 5y agoLet's try this another way. If you're healthy and under 50 your odds of dying from covid are roughly on par with being struck by lightning. Better?
- giraffe_lady 5y agoI'm neither so not really.