3 ms·
Counterpoint: SipHash. Also, in general I disagree. For most people, safe defaults like hash tables with safe hashes and CSPRNG for random numbers are fast eno
by barsonme 5y ago
Counterpoint: SipHash.
Also, in general I disagree. For most people, safe defaults like hash tables with safe hashes and CSPRNG for random numbers are fast enough. And they have the important property of keeping people from shootings themselves in the feet.
People who have more stringent perf requirements will know and shouldn’t have a problem choosing a different implementation.