3 ms·
> It also seems wise to guard against circumstances where it is impossible to become angry or critique an authority class or figure(s). That anger and frustrati
by openplatypus 5y ago
> It also seems wise to guard against circumstances where it is impossible to become angry or critique an authority class or figure(s). That anger and frustration can be justified and if it isn't allowed or listened to, then that is a problem.
Agreed. 100%!
- jka 5y agoHey - I don't know if you'll read this, but I was thinking this through given the ongoing launch of this feature by Microsoft, and a comment I was making regarding text communication on another thread. I understand that this could be a particular problem because so many people communicate purely by text nowadays; writing emails or documents to send to others. In that context -- where it's unlikely the sender will notice the reaction of the recipient, and may be difficult for the recipient to call out the sender on their behaviour, a feature like this makes a lot of sense (thanks for causing me to think this through).