5 ms·
From a legal, practical and technical perspective, any window displayed on any screen is equally succeptible to logging. I can't imagine the fact that the compa
by franga2000 5y ago
From a legal, practical and technical perspective, any window displayed on any screen is equally succeptible to logging. I can't imagine the fact that the company disabled ctrl+c in the policy settings making any difference in a liability case.
- jethro_tell 5y ago*print screen and phone cameras.
- oarsinsync 5y ago> I can't imagine the fact that the company disabled ctrl+c in the policy settings making any difference in a liability case. Taking reasonable measures absolutely does absolve the company. At that point, it becomes a rogue employee who’s deliberately circumvented policies and technical enforcements, who is now potentially personally liable. It’s garbage, but hey ho.
- franga2000 5y agoFair enough, they did "try", but still feels equivalent to putting sensitive documents in a glass frame with a "no photos please" label on it and then claiming you did everything you could to protect them. I can't imagine that would fly in court, but I guess as soon as computers are involved, all common sense is lost.