4 ms·
At the end, The Beatles weren't a masterfully technical band. It wasn't being the greatest at the guitar or the bass or the drums that made them great. It was b
by jason0597 5y ago
At the end, The Beatles weren't a masterfully technical band. It wasn't being the greatest at the guitar or the bass or the drums that made them great. It was being creative that made them great.
Hey Jude is an incredibly simple and easy to play song yet it is infamous
- hericium 5y agoThe pace at which they were releasing new albums was also unrealistic.
- saghm 5y agoI've always considered songwriting to be an independent skill playing music. Some musicians are just so good at writing songs that it almost doesn't matter whether or not they're above average in their musicianship. I don't think anyone would rate Bob Dylan as an exceptional singer or guitarist, but he's unquestionably one of the most prolific musicians of the 20th century. I'm probably an even worse singer and guitarist than Dylan, but if I could write something as good as Like a Rolling Stone, there's no question I would try to perform it myself and have it released before giving the song to someone else.
- ppod 5y agoDylan occasionally produced exceptional vocal performances https://youtu.be/pxr22ih0r9A?t=19 https://youtu.be/pxr22ih0r9A?t=19
- asveikau 5y agoAnd yet Dylan's vocal delivery is still very good in its way. It seems very personal and authentic. If you listen to early 70s Dylan (his tracks on Concert for Bangladesh come to mind) he sounds a bit better vocally in that period. I read that it was because he quit smoking.
- MajesticHobo2 5y agoYou can listen to tapes from his teenage years in the late 50s, where he's singing in almost that exact early 70s croon. But his voice throughout most of the 60s was very different and, for the most part, intentionally so.
- MrsPeaches 5y agoIronically Bob Dylan is also on their roster: http://artcelebs.com/bob-dylan/ http://artcelebs.com/bob-dylan/