First line: > Anti-vaccination protests are nothing new, although in the past they did have some justification. This seems to imply that the author can't find

First line: > Anti-vaccination protests are nothing new, although in the past they did have some justification. This seems to imply that the author can't find any justification whatsoever for current protests. I actually don't know much of anything about any specific protests, but I know that people don't protest for no reason. Whether or not you think the protesters are wrong on balance, you should probably be able to at least understand their case if you're going to be writing about them. I couldn't be bothered to read past that. What useful insight could this author possibly have if they show this kind of thinking?