3 ms·
That's why we should use the term CRAP instead of DRM Content Restriction Access Management would cover all content, including liquid ink. Though you can argu
by georgyo 5y ago
That's why we should use the term CRAP instead of DRM
Content Restriction Access Management would cover all content, including liquid ink.
Though you can argue that "digital" in this case is referring to the chip and reader. These are infact digital components restricting access to liquid.
- lobocinza 5y agoIn this case it's CRAM and I don't think content covers cases concerning hardware like this. Maybe Consumer Restricted Access Pattern. In essence those are monopolistic and consumer hostile practices.
- npteljes 5y agoI agree, and propose that an item having restrictions like this should be referred to as "loaded with CRAP".
- npunt 5y agoI think you mean Content Restriction Access Protection (or Permission), as CRAM just doesn't have quite the ring to it :)
- lurn_mor 5y agoThey'll CRAM it down your throat whether you like it or not.
- indymike 5y agoI can see the CRAM/CRAP bill advance it's way to the Senate floor. Would love to ask my local congressperson "What's your stance on CRAP?" and watch him try to say "I'm all for CRAP it's good for business, and if CRAM/CRAP is good for business, it's good for the little guy." If someone can get this done, I'm running for office on a NO CRAP platform.