3 ms·
I found an article on the Mirror from 2015 (picture below). Their muzmatch logo and heart seem to have a similar font and heart placement when comparing to wha
by hermannj314 5y ago
I found an article on the Mirror from 2015 (picture below). Their muzmatch logo and heart seem to have a similar font and heart placement when comparing to what Google gives for the current match logo. In present day, muzmatch seems to use a different font and a butterfly.
I'm not a trademark lawyer so I have no legal argument to make, but I dont think match is insane for wanting to have a court of law decide if this company has stolen their trademark.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/gallery/tinder-for-muslims-5277435 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/gallery/tinder-for-muslims-527...
- joshuaissac 5y agoAccording to "Logopedia", Match only started using that logo since 2015,[1] which does seem to be supported by their own press releases from 2014 using a different logo.[2] A news article[3] from 2011[4] shows that muzmatch had already been using the logo at the time. So the stealing might have happened the other way. 1. https://logos.fandom.com/wiki/Match.com?oldid=2485091#2003.E2.80.932015 https://logos.fandom.com/wiki/Match.com?oldid=2485091#2003.E... 2. https://match.mediaroom.com/2014-03-20-Match-com-Hits-a-Home-Run-with-Exclusive-MLB-com-Partnership-for-Fans https://match.mediaroom.com/2014-03-20-Match-com-Hits-a-Home... 3. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/business/enterprise/muzmatch-matrimonial-website-for-muslims-866886 https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/business/enterprise/... 4. https://web.archive.org/web/20131221012404/https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/business/enterprise/muzmatch-matrimonial-website-for-muslims-866886 https://web.archive.org/web/20131221012404/https://www.manch...
- hermannj314 5y agoWow! This is great information. Now I am embarrassed I didn't even think of it from this perspective.