Obviously no, because the factors that would cause extreme weather events are not yet there. In general, any abstract model has the same relationships to actu

Obviously no, because the factors that would cause extreme weather events are not yet there. In general, any abstract model has the same relationships to actual reality as cartoons - they look sort of plausible and even convincing, even when a cat or a mouse speaks perfect English. There should be a clear warning statement, like with GMO labeling, that models are astrology with numbers instead of planets and stars. And no, no matter how sophisticated, a model will never be more than a cartoon, in the same way that a map would never be a territory.