Risk is, by definition, always theoretical. In assessing risk of the kind we are discussing here, you are literally estimating (guessing) two things: (1) likeli

Risk is, by definition, always theoretical. In assessing risk of the kind we are discussing here, you are literally estimating (guessing) two things: (1) likelihood and (2) severity of an unwanted event. So yes, this risk is also “theoretical.” Now, given the track record of the Chinese government in matters of this type, it is highly likely they will use their legal right and get the information they want/need. As regards severity, this element is individual: what could be the damage if a particular piece of information would leak? The more sensitive information is, the more damaging the leak may be (and more likely it will be wanted/needed). So if we’re talking about Taiwan, then yeah, aerial imaging information is probably quite pertinent to the Chinese government interest, sensitive or not. So I’d say this risk is material. Plus, I have heard plenty of first-hand accounts indicating certain Chinese drone company being very cosy with the Government, enjoying massive subsidies, so likely cooperating without much hand-twisting needed.