3 ms·
I think the point is worth foot-stomping that the technology doesn't care. Capabilities and data exist, they will be leveraged however they are leveraged. Lega
by smitty1e 5y ago
I think the point is worth foot-stomping that the technology doesn't care. Capabilities and data exist, they will be leveraged however they are leveraged.
Legal restrictions are good as far as they are heeded. Legal restrictions usually include some "emergency" exception mechanism.
The government merely needs to torture some facts to meet "emergency" criteria, and, behold!, all of those heretofore useful capabilities do the unexpected.
One can call this an "entirely theoretical risk", but, given recent abuses, others might call it an inevitability.
- emodendroket 5y agoThen autarky is the only answer, because it's hardly a problem unique to China. Companies pretty much everywhere answer to intelligence services' demands, unless they're operating in a country that's a basket case with incredibly weak control.