3 ms·
To some degree the DoF feels like a trend, there will probably be movies in the 50's made in the Netflix style of the 20's.
by xuhu 5y ago
To some degree the DoF feels like a trend, there will probably be movies in the 50's made in the Netflix style of the 20's.
- staticautomatic 5y agoMaybe, but crazy shallow DoF goes back at least to Kubrick famously shooting parts of Barry Lyndon at f0.7.
- cialowicz 5y agoBarry Lyndon was shot with an f/0.7 lens because Kubrick wanted period-correct lighting: candlelight, which required a super fast lens with the film used. To my knowledge he wasn’t going for shallow DoF.
- staticautomatic 5y agoBe that as it may, the DoF is unavoidable unless every shot is insanely tight.
- gannonburgett 5y agoYou are correct. This wonderful article taken from American Cinematographer goes over this very topic in great detail: http://www.visual-memory.co.uk/sk/ac/len/page1.htm http://www.visual-memory.co.uk/sk/ac/len/page1.htm
- kwhitefoot 5y agoI just want to say thank you for that link; it was an inspiring read. I think it's time to watch Barry Lyndon again.
- JeremyNT 5y agoIs this at least partly due to higher resolution / larger displays? Better quality displays with higher resolution sources will make a difference between out-of-focus and in-focus more apparent.