3 ms·
>Even wider scope, a child who "qualified moved" within the last 36 months is considered migratory i.e. homeless. This is what the definition of migratory chil
by Clubber 5y ago
>Even wider scope, a child who "qualified moved" within the last 36 months is considered migratory i.e. homeless.
This is what the definition of migratory child is.
(3) MIGRATORY CHILD.—The term ‘‘migratory child’’ means a child or youth who made a qualifying move in the preceding 36 months—
(A) as a migratory agricultural worker or a migratory fisher; or
(B) with, or to join, a parent or spouse who is a migratory agricultural worker or a migratory fisher.
It's not just that they moved (which is what I read from your comment) but they are a child who's parents are migratory workers and moved within 36 months.
>For example if you live in a trailer park, you are considered homeless.
This seems to check out. It's odd in the rest of the definition.
>(i) children and youths who are sharing the housing of other persons due to loss of housing, economic hardship, or a similar reason; are living in motels, hotels, trailer parks, or camping grounds due to the lack of alternative adequate accommodations; are living in emergency or transitional shelters; or are abandoned in hospitals;*
- genericuser314 5y ago"...due to the lack of alternative adequate accommodations" It isn't true that children whose permanent residence is a trailer park are counted as homeless.
- Clubber 5y ago>are living in motels, hotels, trailer parks, or camping grounds due to the lack of alternative adequate accommodations To me it reads the following aren't adequate accommodations if they are by themselves (i.e. no other housing): motels, hotels, trailer parks, or camping grounds. I personally don't think a trailer in a trailer park with an address should be categorized as homeless, I'm just trying to interpret the law as a layperson. Maybe trailer parks were different back in 1965 (i.e. no address).