3 ms·

This is about static IP addresses, not "servers". Anyone would be happy to run a server on their cellphone, but there's no good way to publish the address. It'

This is about static IP addresses, not "servers". Anyone would be happy to run a server on their cellphone, but there's no good way to publish the address. It's DNS that makes us think a static IP is needed to have a "server". When there's an alternative, this will change

vt240 5y ago
I understand this issue with cellular end-points. I saw a comment on one of the two previous posts here, where a user complained it was impossible to obtain static IP allocations for setting up their own "servers". I found this odd, since in my own history this has never been a problem for a nominal fee, even when I had a 9600Baud modem connecting my network with PPP. I am now wondering, if perhaps I've misinterpreted the concern, that people would like to be able to serve content from their smart phones with fixed IPv4 addressing? What is the actual use case for this?
- spxtr 5y ago
  I have comcast internet with my own modem/router. Comcast will not give me a static IP unless I use their rental modem/router, which costs quite a bit monthly. I use ddns to work around this issue, and it mostly works fine.
  - vt240 5y ago
    I agree with this. Comcast, is certainly not the cheapest option. We pay right now around $220/mo to have our /29 addresses routed through Comcast. It was about half that over bonded channels of VDSL. But these rates may be a non-starter for a home setup. But it still seems pretty low cost, given what I hear from most of my friends about what they're paying for Cellular plus Home-entertainment on a monthly basis.
  - vt240 5y ago
    I also don't have a static ip at home, but have a hub-star private network that runs over Cisco routers over the Comcast network that allows multiple employees to share in the resources, from the single connection with public facing IPs, with pretty low latency through the private network. It's all done on the cheap, but fast enough I can remote into the office and work on 3d models or photoshop. Certainly fast enough for routing side projects for testing. Obviously this is more complex and costly than the initial home setup of a single node. But even in more rural situations it should be easy to build up networks of like minded people with local ISPs which could share resources like this. Apply for /24, get it setup with an ISP, and then VPN the rest of the traffic in from fellow customers.
BlueTemplar 5y ago
Ah, that's a good point ! While getting a static IP prefix subnet should be the default for regular connections, and the situation for that should only get better with time, AFAIK cellular Internet is still kind of an unsolved problem... since moving to another cell means getting another prefix ! But then isn't this the kind of issues that can also be handled by decentralization via replication of data across the Internet ? (Would probably still be prohibitive for data that is both obscure and heavy...)

vt240 5y ago

I understand this issue with cellular end-points. I saw a comment on one of the two previous posts here, where a user complained it was impossible to obtain static IP allocations for setting up their own "servers". I found this odd, since in my own history this has never been a problem for a nominal fee, even when I had a 9600Baud modem connecting my network with PPP. I am now wondering, if perhaps I've misinterpreted the concern, that people would like to be able to serve content from their smart phones with fixed IPv4 addressing? What is the actual use case for this?

spxtr 5y ago
I have comcast internet with my own modem/router. Comcast will not give me a static IP unless I use their rental modem/router, which costs quite a bit monthly. I use ddns to work around this issue, and it mostly works fine.
- vt240 5y ago
  I agree with this. Comcast, is certainly not the cheapest option. We pay right now around $220/mo to have our /29 addresses routed through Comcast. It was about half that over bonded channels of VDSL. But these rates may be a non-starter for a home setup. But it still seems pretty low cost, given what I hear from most of my friends about what they're paying for Cellular plus Home-entertainment on a monthly basis.
- vt240 5y ago
  I also don't have a static ip at home, but have a hub-star private network that runs over Cisco routers over the Comcast network that allows multiple employees to share in the resources, from the single connection with public facing IPs, with pretty low latency through the private network. It's all done on the cheap, but fast enough I can remote into the office and work on 3d models or photoshop. Certainly fast enough for routing side projects for testing. Obviously this is more complex and costly than the initial home setup of a single node. But even in more rural situations it should be easy to build up networks of like minded people with local ISPs which could share resources like this. Apply for /24, get it setup with an ISP, and then VPN the rest of the traffic in from fellow customers.

BlueTemplar 5y ago

Ah, that's a good point ! While getting a static IP prefix subnet should be the default for regular connections, and the situation for that should only get better with time, AFAIK cellular Internet is still kind of an unsolved problem... since moving to another cell means getting another prefix ! But then isn't this the kind of issues that can also be handled by decentralization via replication of data across the Internet ? (Would probably still be prohibitive for data that is both obscure and heavy...)