If something were to be proposed as a systemd replacement today, I'm pretty sure I'd treat it with a lot of skepticism. I likely would use arguments the sysv fo

If something were to be proposed as a systemd replacement today, I'm pretty sure I'd treat it with a lot of skepticism. I likely would use arguments the sysv folks made like "why fix what isn't broken" etc. Excluding the kooks angered enough to send hate mail to the systemd developers, I can understand the old criticisms and aggravation from sysv folks. I was front and center as a relatively new user of Fedora at the time systemd was adopted. While I was familiar with sysv, I wasn't attached to it. I also found sysv a lot more confounding and obscure than systemd in the early days, even though the transition did have rough spots. But I'm definitely attached to systemd now.