3 ms·
Re: offline mode. I've had to deal with this a few times. I make a brief mention of it in my article but gloss over the details because I wanted to get on to m
by hammerdr 15y ago
Re: offline mode.
I've had to deal with this a few times. I make a brief mention of it in my article but gloss over the details because I wanted to get on to more important topics.
In general, offline mode has been a terrible experience for me. It is handled differently in different versions of TFS. In one version (2008?), you go to File -> Offline Mode. In another, you need to either reopen the solution and get prompted project by project to Temporarily Work Offline or unbind TFS manually.
In both solutions, I've had difficulty reconnecting to TFS. In a complex set of steps that were probably "dumb" but seemed like my only options, I have lost changes made on my local file system.
My experience may vary from others, granted. Though, after talking to some colleagues about their experience, mine has been easy.
- skeletonjelly 15y agoFair enough. I guess the overall impression we both share of the offline process can be summed up by the word "unintuitive". Also funnily enough, I've just come back after lunch to find something has killed SQL Server, which has affected TFS, forcing me to experience all the joy that is offline mode. I'll no doubt be swearing and cursing MS in a few minutes.
- skeletonjelly 15y agoTurns out I was wrong. It doesn't clear the read only flag. Just makes you overwrite the file. The scary thought is that TFS only recognises changes if the file is writable. Hopefully it does when our SQL machine comes back up. I shouldn't have to hope though.