>500 pages a month is not a serious answer, its dodging. I agree. That's why I think the focus should be on holding them accountable to a badly formed review p

>500 pages a month is not a serious answer, its dodging. I agree. That's why I think the focus should be on holding them accountable to a badly formed review process. I think where we disagree is I also think the answer of "hire 100x the people" is an equally invalid answer. They know that's a non-starter as well. They know they won't be authorized to hire that many and they also know that even if they could, they wouldn't be spun up in time to meet the deadline. I'd personally rather see an IG/GAO investigation into their process.