I think it's even worse than that, because a significant part of Moxie's argument is that the current centralized web3 approaches have structural advantages (es

I think it's even worse than that, because a significant part of Moxie's argument is that the current centralized web3 approaches have structural advantages (especially speed of innovation) that will leave the "proposed solutions" constantly trying to catch up. And the incredible popularity of the centralized approaches seems to suggest users in the web3 space value those advantages more than they value adhering to the distributed principles supposedly at the heart of web3. To their credit, the author of the rebuttal acknowledges that the Opensea type approaches are problematic, but misses the greater argument around why they're popular and why trying to replace them with something "better" will be difficult.