3 ms·
This sort of mosaic-y, rigidly geometric style would only fit in with certain website designs, and the colors in the examples are all extremely saturated. I thi
by artursapek 15y ago
This sort of mosaic-y, rigidly geometric style would only fit in with certain website designs, and the colors in the examples are all extremely saturated. I think having to sort through these would be really exhausting on the eyes.
Also, it reminds me of the geometric defaults Gravatar resorts to if someone hasn't uploaded a photograph. (http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/98287fc0f05ebed1c2aae6bc2d236d3a?s=80&d=identicon http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/98287fc0f05ebed1c2aae6bc2d236...) (http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/3fbdc6a307d10a1725a54b2b391b5cfd?s=80&d=identicon http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/3fbdc6a307d10a1725a54b2b391b5...).
I hate to say it, but it's a common rule of thumb in graphic design that people like to see other people. Faces. That's what user icons tend to be, because it's what works.
- andrewcooke 15y agosee my answer elsewhere (and i'll update the site tomorrow) - this is not to replace photos, but an alternative to other auto-generated icons. also, if anyone wants less saturated images, or any other variation, please contact me and i'll see what i can do. i'm happy to iterate this (for example, things will likely be changing to address the colourblind issue raised elsewhere).