4 ms·
> Some of the wording in the article is weird, and the "Context" gives very little of the relevant context. You're only looking at the abstract. (Weirdly the a
by OscarCunningham 5y ago
> Some of the wording in the article is weird, and the "Context" gives very little of the relevant context.
You're only looking at the abstract. (Weirdly the abstract has separate sections. I haven't seen that before.)
- Taywee 5y agoYou're right. I'm not used to these sorts of sites and I thought that might be the case, but I couldn't find the link to find the PDF to access it, because it was part of the header bar (and becomes a floating header). I just tuned that out as irrelevant because I'm so used to ignoring floating headers when I'm not trying to navigate a site, and was looking everywhere in the center column, somewhere underneath the title for the link, didn't find it, and assumed that this was the entire article. That said, wow, this wants $36 just to read this single article, or I need to be part of an institution that gives me free access. That's steep. I'd like to read the entire article, but not given that price. Really hurts the accessibility of good information to have it that exclusionary.
- OscarCunningham 5y agoI pirated it from Sci-Hub. > good information Heh.