> By the way, what's the point of comparing Fukushima to something else terrible? Because in Germany the concrete choice 10-15 years ago was between developing

> By the way, what's the point of comparing Fukushima to something else terrible? Because in Germany the concrete choice 10-15 years ago was between developing nuclear, or burning lignite now and importing gas from oligarchies later. These were the only two options on table which were politically and technically feasible. (And then Fukushima made nuclear no longer politically feasible. And now it's also too late to be technically feasible.)