> So if the Zephyr is not PPE, why claim this personal equipment provides protection? If you want to talk about misleading marketing, how about point the finge

> So if the Zephyr is not PPE, why claim this personal equipment provides protection? If you want to talk about misleading marketing, how about point the finger at everyone who claims that unregulated cloth face masks provide personal protection? There are absolutely no standards for what constitutes a face covering. Are face covering manufacturers allowed to claim that their face coverings provide personal protection? If not, why the hell are we all forced to wear them?