3 ms·
The shift is still there, though. The data missing, though, is the sizes in cm/in. I wouldn't be surprised if M/L/XL changed meaning between those dates.
by glandium 5y ago
The shift is still there, though. The data missing, though, is the sizes in cm/in. I wouldn't be surprised if M/L/XL changed meaning between those dates.
- finite_jest 5y agoIt is possible that the meaning of the sizes changed, but that would probably go in the direction of making the shift larger. [1] [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanity_sizing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanity_sizing