> That way lies madness. Perhaps. I think a clearer understanding could also give us a better appreciation of our common values and unique differences. There i

> That way lies madness. Perhaps. I think a clearer understanding could also give us a better appreciation of our common values and unique differences. There is something we all share in common: a desire for peace, order, stability. And there is something qualitatively different between how Eastern and Western societies are structured to achieve those goals. By studying our historical differences, we can build a better understanding of how our societies are uniquely equipped to handle future challenges. > I had quite a lot of extra inertia and kinetic energy. That is an interesting story, thank you for sharing! I agree with you that physical differences are definitely worth celebrating. Fat people have an advantage in many arenas (can survive much longer in famine and are good at physical sports like rugby), just like people who live in high altitudes or chase food to survive. More importantly, humans also have ideological differences and it would seem those differences, real or perceived, are the source of our current tensions. > Where do you perceive East and West colliding? Historically, friction has arisen in two places: the Middle East, and the Pacific. The first seems more religiously motivated, which could be a reflection of different cultural values but I think those waters are too muddy to tell. The recent cross-Pacific tension seems like a more direct clash between individualism and collectivism. Studying the environmental factors that gave rise to our differences could help us navigate where each society is better adapted, or how they can complement each other to achieve our common goals.