You say this work is “without references,” and mock the research and the expertise of the authors in several ways. Very little you say is specific and most of i

You say this work is “without references,” and mock the research and the expertise of the authors in several ways. Very little you say is specific and most of it is not even accurate. TFA is a gloss on a paper published at Science Advances. The details you seek about the data and the models are there in the journal article and in the supplemental material of the article. The lead author (http://www.regionalclimateperspectives.com/ http://www.regionalclimateperspectives.com/) is a PhD in Earth science and is a postdoc at a reasonably well respected lab (JPL in Pasadena). Taken together, all this makes your comment look both foolish and wrong. What’s the point of writing such junk?