You seem to be all over the place, I picked $500 cash because YOU used that as an example. Do you remember? Scroll up a bit. >The rest of your argument un

You seem to be all over the place, I picked $500 cash because YOU used that as an example. Do you remember? Scroll up a bit. >The rest of your argument unravels, because you've based it on this fundamentally flawed assumption. No, it's not flawed, it's not my argument, it's logic and economic theory that anyone without some weird learning disability can follow. If there are two groups of people and you give them both newly created money, but one group more money, the group that got less is worse off. Just because number go up doesn't mean they're better off.