4 ms·
> We are not talking about a request for POTUS tax returns. You're right, we're talking about random private citizens medical information, which falls under 6.
by joshuamorton 5y ago
> We are not talking about a request for POTUS tax returns.
You're right, we're talking about random private citizens medical information, which falls under 6. That's what the majority of the pages requested are, and why it'll take so long to redact them: they're mostly clinical notes about people like you and me. The relevant information that won't be redacted is already publicly accessible.
- tagoregrtst 5y agoDont worry, Federal agencies aren't shy to redact. Or perhaps they’ll be “anonymized” which is tech’s go to term for running roughshod over our secrecy.
- Jimmc414 5y agoPeople like you and me who willingly participated in a public funded study. If Pfizer did not anonymize the data from the beginning that is foolish at best.
- avs733 5y ago…they wouldn’t be allowed to anonymize data they submit to the fda Honestly this discussion is insane, this entire discussion presumes a bunch of people selling snake oil are more credible than the people trying to make sure drugs are safe. The “well the fda screws up sometimes” is only useful to that argument if you have already picked the narrative you want. Otherwise it’s like saying I’d rather go to see with a cannibal I have never met than my younger brother because he bit me once when we were kids.