3 ms·
Well, isn't power always corrupting? Consider the sex that would occur in a marriage where the wife has no skills or earning potential (so she must submit to
by grandalf 15y ago
Well, isn't power always corrupting? Consider the sex that would occur in a marriage where the wife has no skills or earning potential (so she must submit to the husband's will or become effectively homeless if he divorces her).
Entrenched power in a group of >2 people works the same way. In the case of the US Government, most Americans don't seriously consider any other country of residence, so our leaders get away with all sorts of disgraceful acts.
Without competition there will always be corruption.
Due to a fluke of the geography and history of the US, it has been difficult for the central government to get all that strong. In the past it had to do things like build out cities over marsh land (New Orleans) or provide useful services (like the post office, railways). But now that it has a hold on power, our entitlement system is broken and most of the tax dollars flow to special interests (the military, oil industry, healthcare, finance).
So I think your observation is true, but due to a more general principle... which is the innate brutality of all humans when granted power over others.
- jergason 15y agoI have zero evidence to support this hypothesis, but it seems like power corrupts most the people who seek it the most. Some people do better with power than others. Also, I am not sure what you are trying to say about sex in marriage. It sounds like you are trying to say that men are held back from mistreating spouses only because they can't get away with it. Is that true? I have witnessed first hand that that can happen, but it was in a very poor society. Do you think that is common in marriages in prosperous countries?