4 ms·
The article opens: "Is there anything Samsung doesn’t do?" I say: "Is there anything Samsung doesn't clone?" This is shameless: http://9to5mac.com/2011/07/18/
by rhygar 15y ago
The article opens: "Is there anything Samsung doesn’t do?"
I say: "Is there anything Samsung doesn't clone?"
This is shameless:
http://9to5mac.com/2011/07/18/family-ties-earn-this-smart-cover-knock-off-a-samsung-certification-and-a-place-on-their-store-shelves/ http://9to5mac.com/2011/07/18/family-ties-earn-this-smart-co...
- Kylekramer 15y agoA: Not a Samsung product. B: Nothing is new under the sun: http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/03/apple-ipad-2-smart-cover-vs-incase-convertible-magazine-jacket/ http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/03/apple-ipad-2-smart-cover-...
- rhygar 15y agoA. "Not a Samsung product": in a technical sense yes but in a practical sense no. It was made by the CEO's cousin and had Samsung's stamp of approval. Samsung only yanked approval after it was pointed out how blatant of a copy it was. B. The Samsung clone and the Apple original both have "Smart" in the name, both have ridged covers, and both come in pastel colors. The advertising is even the same - each color case is fanned out in the picture. The evidence is blatantly clear here that Samsung is trying to copy Apple's design.