3 ms·

I don't follow. "The minimum insurance that they get is inadequate to my needs" seems like a poor argument when the alternative is "absolutely nothing, which is

I don't follow. "The minimum insurance that they get is inadequate to my needs" seems like a poor argument when the alternative is "absolutely nothing, which is inadequate for everyone". In the US, instead of wait times, we have people who just go without entirely. I know if I was unemployed, I'd much prefer an 18 week wait time to a "no". And for anyone privileged to be able to afford good insurance in the US, you can presumably pay for better private insurance/service in Europe, right?

onphonenow 5y ago
If you don't mind long waits, then a UK style system may be a good option for you. Places like Germany have taken a very different approach. Govt stays out of delivery of care entirely, but everyone has coverage basically (80% public/20% private maybe). Public care is pretty good with low waits. But govt not delivering it.