> but equally it doesn’t represent an aberration or break some natural law. The comment you are replying to never said it does. > So I take issue with the ide

> but equally it doesn’t represent an aberration or break some natural law. The comment you are replying to never said it does. > So I take issue with the idea that determining sex is universally trivial the comment you are replying to never said this. > sometimes these people need help to understand how they fit in a world that culturally assumes they don’t exist. The comment you are replying to doesn’t dispute this. It’s not clear how what you have written relates to the comment you are replying to.