> "I'll work for you but only if you can't fire me" is something only the most desperate companies would accept unless they are forced to. Yeah this would be a

> "I'll work for you but only if you can't fire me" is something only the most desperate companies would accept unless they are forced to. Yeah this would be a red flag on the candidate immediately. What I meant was that the negotiation should be on the notice period not on being unfirable. I see it's a huge burden on the company to not be able to fire someone and what ends up happening when you have a bad apple is other team members start leaving.