2 ms·
It’s not immense compared to almost anything else we’ve done (such as the transition to air conditioning… air conditioners consume about 6% of US electricity).
by Robotbeat 5y ago
It’s not immense compared to almost anything else we’ve done (such as the transition to air conditioning… air conditioners consume about 6% of US electricity). To replace all US ammonia production would require less than 5% of US electricity (see my other post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29842105 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29842105).
Heck, you can get about halfway there just on the nuclear power plants in the US that have been shut down in the last couple decades!
(Works well with intermittent renewables, too, as hydrogen production can be throttled without much penalty.)
- TheSpiceIsLife 5y agoIn what way is building forty odd new nuclear reactors not an immense undertaking? Or the equivalent in new renewables, if that’s your preference.
- Robotbeat 5y agoAgain, we used to double grid capacity every decade or so. An extra 5 percent is nothing in comparison to what we did doubling electricity production each decade from roughly the 40s through the 70s. (And that’s about 10-20 new nuclear reactors, not 40. A fraction of our current nuclear fleet.)