3 ms·
Just be sure they're not contracting out development to artificially reduce the FTE count and increase this ratio. Another strange ration was a CEO at a tier 1
by phkahler 5y ago
Just be sure they're not contracting out development to artificially reduce the FTE count and increase this ratio.
Another strange ration was a CEO at a tier 1 automotive supplier telling us he was looking at engineering as a percent of sales (or revenue or similar). We were above the industry average which seemed to indicate spending "too much" on engineering. My first thought was that a lot of engineering (vehicle specific calibration and software tweaking and integration) was on a per-vehicle basis, so that metric could be improved by not taking the smaller production programs. DUH. But as a leader it makes sense to grab all that business, including the less profitable projects. Maybe those are even a basket of programs with one OEM negotiated all at once. Who knows.
- texasbigdata 5y agoEspecially if you're not capitalizing any of that spend and expensing it all to be conservative in your financial reporting. The eng spend could benefit you later down the road so it's perhaps naive to say it's bad to be above industry average