7 ms·

What reaction do you think the government should take then?

mentat 15y ago
Actually try to understand and address the grievances? There's a substantial part of the country who feels like they've been left behind and they're not that far from becoming violent. Throwing a bunch of fraud committing bankers in jail for breaking the laws that are on the books right now would be a start. If people don't believe that the laws apply to everyone anymore then they're not going to be interested in keeping them.
- cjdavis 15y ago
  This is as likely and will be taken as seriously as the possibility of addressing the grievances of the people that committed 9/11. To continue the over-generalization - that Anonymous has not (yet) claimed responsibility for any violent acts is the only thing separating the two in the eyes of the government (and the general public.)
  - deleted 15y ago
    [deleted]
  - mentat 15y ago
    Anonymous, the hacker group, is not synonymous with people who are sympathetic is some of their real world actions. The best way to separate the pure anarchic core from people who are just pissed would be to address some of the most obvious injustices currently perceived by Anonymous' target audience. If we're really at the point at which it's impossible to recognize differences of opinion, or more specifically, belief that laws should be upheld as a "grievance" then things are much worse than I thought.
  - wnight 15y ago
    > This is as likely and will be taken as seriously as the possibility of addressing the grievances of the people that committed 9/11. And this is why things will continue to happen to you without your understanding. > that Anonymous has not (yet) claimed responsibility for any violent acts is the only thing separating the two in the eyes of the government (and the general public. That you have (yet) to rape someone (or perhaps only to be caught for it) is the only thing separating you from a rapist in the eyes of the public. What was your point? The government though is a different story, they don't have an opinion, they have spin. If something weakens the USA's unjust power, the government is against it. If it helps them, they're for it. Sociopaths will say anything.
- rick888 15y ago
  "Actually try to understand and address the grievances?" When the people of Anonymous decide to act like civilized adults rather than teen-angst laden teenagers, I might start to agree with you. The group reminds me of many people I see on Reddit that can't get their way and their only response to this is anti-social and childish behavior.
  - nitrogen 15y ago
    "Civilized adults" who were fed up with things like taxation without representation tarred and feathered people, destroyed large amounts of cargo, and violently overthrew their government.
    - rick888 15y ago
      "who were fed up with things like taxation without representation tarred and feathered people, destroyed large amounts of cargo, and violently overthrew their government." I make a pretty good living and I don't like the new jobs program and taxes that Obama is proposing. If I acted like Anonymous in response to this, would you think it was okay too?
      - nitrogen 15y ago
        As a first response? No. I'm just intuiting here so I may be wrong, but it seems to me that extreme action by an ever-growing fringe of society is a symptom of a larger, festering problem. As societal angst builds up over time due to systemic problems, the distribution of that angst will not be uniform. Anonymous is just one example of a subset of society where the accumulated angst is higher. To paraphrase the saying, they're just saying what we're all thinking. They're just saying it in a way that few people approve of, but if that's the only way they can be heard, then that's what they'll do.
        rick888 15y ago
        Some might say the tea party falls into the exact same category. "They're just saying it in a way that few people approve of, but if that's the only way they can be heard, then that's what they'll do." ..and I don't agree with it. Eventually it will lead to senseless violence in addition to the senseless destruction. They are on the same level as any low-level terrorist group.

Actually try to understand and address the grievances? There's a substantial part of the country who feels like they've been left behind and they're not that far from becoming violent. Throwing a bunch of fraud committing bankers in jail for breaking the laws that are on the books right now would be a start. If people don't believe that the laws apply to everyone anymore then they're not going to be interested in keeping them.

cjdavis 15y ago
This is as likely and will be taken as seriously as the possibility of addressing the grievances of the people that committed 9/11. To continue the over-generalization - that Anonymous has not (yet) claimed responsibility for any violent acts is the only thing separating the two in the eyes of the government (and the general public.)
- deleted 15y ago
  [deleted]
- mentat 15y ago
  Anonymous, the hacker group, is not synonymous with people who are sympathetic is some of their real world actions. The best way to separate the pure anarchic core from people who are just pissed would be to address some of the most obvious injustices currently perceived by Anonymous' target audience. If we're really at the point at which it's impossible to recognize differences of opinion, or more specifically, belief that laws should be upheld as a "grievance" then things are much worse than I thought.
- wnight 15y ago
  > This is as likely and will be taken as seriously as the possibility of addressing the grievances of the people that committed 9/11. And this is why things will continue to happen to you without your understanding. > that Anonymous has not (yet) claimed responsibility for any violent acts is the only thing separating the two in the eyes of the government (and the general public. That you have (yet) to rape someone (or perhaps only to be caught for it) is the only thing separating you from a rapist in the eyes of the public. What was your point? The government though is a different story, they don't have an opinion, they have spin. If something weakens the USA's unjust power, the government is against it. If it helps them, they're for it. Sociopaths will say anything.
rick888 15y ago
"Actually try to understand and address the grievances?" When the people of Anonymous decide to act like civilized adults rather than teen-angst laden teenagers, I might start to agree with you. The group reminds me of many people I see on Reddit that can't get their way and their only response to this is anti-social and childish behavior.
- nitrogen 15y ago
  "Civilized adults" who were fed up with things like taxation without representation tarred and feathered people, destroyed large amounts of cargo, and violently overthrew their government.
  - rick888 15y ago
    "who were fed up with things like taxation without representation tarred and feathered people, destroyed large amounts of cargo, and violently overthrew their government." I make a pretty good living and I don't like the new jobs program and taxes that Obama is proposing. If I acted like Anonymous in response to this, would you think it was okay too?
    - nitrogen 15y ago
      As a first response? No. I'm just intuiting here so I may be wrong, but it seems to me that extreme action by an ever-growing fringe of society is a symptom of a larger, festering problem. As societal angst builds up over time due to systemic problems, the distribution of that angst will not be uniform. Anonymous is just one example of a subset of society where the accumulated angst is higher. To paraphrase the saying, they're just saying what we're all thinking. They're just saying it in a way that few people approve of, but if that's the only way they can be heard, then that's what they'll do.
      - rick888 15y ago
        Some might say the tea party falls into the exact same category. "They're just saying it in a way that few people approve of, but if that's the only way they can be heard, then that's what they'll do." ..and I don't agree with it. Eventually it will lead to senseless violence in addition to the senseless destruction. They are on the same level as any low-level terrorist group.