It was inevitable that they would go after hackers that do illegal things, but I wonder if they are prepared to handle what Anonymous really is? It's not enoug

It was inevitable that they would go after hackers that do illegal things, but I wonder if they are prepared to handle what Anonymous really is? It's not enough to prove that someone is in Anonymous... They have to have prove the person actually did some hacking for it. Anyone can -say- they are in Anonymous without having any idea what others are doing under the name. The article notes they have no leaders... But they also have no member list or any real organization at all, beyond what pops up spontaneously for each cause. You can't say any 2 hacks are related to each other unless you can prove the same people were in on them... Which is the opposite of how they usually do it. It's going to be ugly.