102 ms·
More proof that California not allowing non-competes is a key driver of innovation.
by elbasti 5y ago
More proof that California not allowing non-competes is a key driver of innovation.
- FroshKiller 5y agoIt won't be proof until Intel delivers.
- coldtea 5y agoParent said competition. This is competition. Whether Intel's SoC chips will end up being good is orthogonal. Competition is not about a party making better stuff than another, it's about been given the chance to work to make it (and not have BS inpediments, like implicit or explicit aggrements to never cross-hire between two companies).
- usefulcat 5y ago"Prior to working for Apple, Wilcox was at Intel where he served as a principal engineer on PC chipsets ..."
- tcmart14 5y agoThat explains it. I was wondering, isn't this going to lead to a lot of courtroom time? I didn't realize California killed non-compete clauses, thanks!
- StringyBob 5y agoThe lead architect of every main Apple CPU from A7 to the M1Max is still going through a court case, being sued because of a non-compete for trying to do a startup https://www.theregister.com/2019/12/09/apple_nuvia_ceo_suit/ https://www.theregister.com/2019/12/09/apple_nuvia_ceo_suit/