3 ms·
I have to disagree with you on this particular story because: 1. The particular incident described is a sufficiently egregious violation of established norms t
by olefoo 18y ago
I have to disagree with you on this particular story because:
1. The particular incident described is a sufficiently egregious violation of established norms to qualify as a new phenomenon.
2. Warrantless searches; trumped up charges and the willful violation of civil rights speaks directly to the suitability of the US business environment.
I'm sorry but if this is the sort of behavior we can expect from law enforcement should the republican party retain power then no business is safe in this country.
Your promising startup could be nuked because your main competitor is the nephew of the local capo of Homeland Security. And money is no protection; look to the experiences of the Jews in Europe.
- jmtulloss 18y agoI agree with you except for the warrantless searches part. I think they did indeed have a warrant, which they were able to obtain by infiltrating the RNC Welcoming Committee and getting enough evidence to get a warrant from a judge.