3 ms·
one difference is that authoritarian regimes have been known to infuse everything with state propaganda, whereas almost nobody expects this from western democra
by janimo 5y ago
one difference is that authoritarian regimes have been known to infuse everything with state propaganda, whereas almost nobody expects this from western democracies, showing just how much more subtle and even effective the latter can be.
- rnd0 5y ago>whereas almost nobody expects this from western democracies Are you joking? Ever since 9/11 the US has been pumping out propaganda disguised as entertainment like gangbusters! It's really obvious when you go and watch reruns of old copaganda shows from 03 to 06, and then there's "24". Of course there's also blatant ra-ra Military propaganda like J.A.G. and NCIS It's not surprising to see outright propaganda from the US, it's surprising how many decades it's taken for people to begin to call it what it is. Surprising and depressing.
- goodpoint 5y agoWhat you wrote is true, but it's astonishing how people tolerate having an industrial production of propaganda (since WW2) in what should be a democracy.
- MrYellowP 5y agoDemocracy and propaganda aren't mutually exclusive. Plus, the US isn't a democracy. In fact, most countries banging the democracy-propaganda-horn aren't actually democracies. Austria, for example, is a Republic. Democracy is just a smokescreen.
- goodpoint 5y ago> ... aren't actually democracies. Austria, for example, is a Republic "republic" and "democracy" are in no way mutually exclusive terms. On the contrary, the overlap very often. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic for a definition.