8 ms·
Hijacking here to say, literally all you need to get access to someones employment + salary history is their SSN and birthdate. edit: and a past employer that
by BeefySwain 5y ago
Hijacking here to say, literally all you need to get access to someones employment + salary history is their SSN and birthdate.
edit: and a past employer that used this system
Birthdays are extremely easy to get (public record), and I seem to recall a specific large organization leaking a bunch of SSN's not too long ago.......
- cmeacham98 5y agoUnless you are very young (read: born after 2011) your SSN can be trivially brute forced if an attacker knows where and when you were born, because those details were (before 2011) mapped onto 5 of the 9 digits in an SSN.
- dhosek 5y agoMore accurately where you were born and when your SSN was issued (my brothers who are four years older than me got their SSNs at the same time I did). Some of us older folks were born in an era in which you didn't automatically get an SSN along with the birth certificate. And then there are people who weren't born in the US so will have had their SSN not matching birth year. I also think it's less than 5 of the 9 digits that are reflected in this manner. That would not leave room for a lot of distinction in SSNs.
- kevin_thibedeau 5y agoThe first three digits are allocated in blocks to each state.
- gzer0 5y agohttps://www.ssa.gov/employer/stateweb.htm https://www.ssa.gov/employer/stateweb.htm I'm guessing this is not a good thing if I am under the [NOT ISSUED] category but am definitely in the issued category?
- throwawayboise 5y agoYou should assume your SSN is public anyway. There have been so many leaks, and it's not like a credit card where you get a new number if it is compromised.
- drewcoo 5y agoBecause it was intended as an identifier, not as a secret. The financial industry couldn't tell the difference between the two so now everyone tries to hide their IDs.
- diggernet 5y agoIt wasn't even intended as an identifier. It's just an account number. "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION". https://media.istockphoto.com/photos/social-security-card-picture-id877763092 https://media.istockphoto.com/photos/social-security-card-pi...
- MertsA 5y ago>The financial industry couldn't tell the difference between the two so now everyone tries to hide their IDs. What's sad and funny is that the login page for "The Work Number" quite literally uses the following for their username field. <input name="txtUsername" type="password" maxlength="256" id="txtUsername">
- olliej 5y agoHate to break it to you but that’s 21 year olds now :) [edit: so I program for a living. you'd think I know how to subtract to integers??? I /assume/ I read 2001? at least I hope I did]
- peoplefromibiza 5y agoIn Italy you don't even need to brute force them, you can generate them because the algorithm is public. Except same rare case of same name, same birthday, same place of birth, the generated code is always valid. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_fiscal_code https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_fiscal_code
- davidsawyer 5y agoAnd you'd need to know a past employer, right? I couldn't seem to find a way to get access to the info without inputting an employer first.
- BeefySwain 5y agoGood catch, I'll add that.
- throwaway2037 5y agoMany people post their professional career on LinkedIn. Again, it seems easy to find this information through public sources.
- davidsawyer 5y agoYep, 100% agree.
- divbzero 5y agoIt seems crazy to allow a large organization like that to continue operation after such an egregious error, especially if their business is centered around a bunch of personal information.
- imglorp 5y agoTheir customers are happy. And that means Congress is kept happy. You are not their customer and Congress doesn't care if you are happy.
- randmeerkat 5y agoThis is what crony capitalism looks like.
- sershe 5y agoCan you elaborate? Who is crony to whom here? Everyone in the exchange gives the information willingly... people here talk a lot about salary sharing, so here you go, your employer is doing salary sharing with other employers. Someone else facilitates it and makes money. What's wrong with that? I know why I am going to freeze my data, I don't want employers to know my past salaries - but that's anti-capitalist, I am removing information from the market to give myself an edge in negotiations, and to propagate inequality. Equifax don't have to do it on "capitalist" principles, but they allow me to do that... the only crony thing is the opt-out form I guess ;)
- nopenopenopeno 5y agoIt’s also what regular capitalism looks like.
- thesuitonym 5y agoRegular capitalism always becomes crony capitalism, and then probably neo-fuedalism.
- jokethrowaway 5y ago
- mellavora 5y agoSSNs are generated by a not very secret algorithm. They were explicitly designed to be public information. You don't need a data leak to get someone's SSN. Also, malicious actors are almost never targeting you specifically. It is enough for them to 1) choose a birthdate 2) generate all SSNs associated with that birthdate 3) get all employment/salary histories accessible with that info. 4) scan the list for interesting tagets 5) ... 6) profit