3 ms·

Discarded React because it takes 120K? The background image on his blog post is 168K https://michelenasti.com/images/bg.jpg https://michelenasti.com/images/bg

• stickyricky 5y ago
  I assume his personal blog is not the usecase. There may be bandwidth limitations in their usecase.
  • andrewstuart 5y ago
    That's what's missing here - a set of criteria defining what matters in the evaluation. What are the key criteria and what core does each framework get? Also, the "built some new thing" must be evaluated and scored alongside the others. If "we are building for super low bandwidth users" matters then it should be stated in this blog post. Here's a start point for criteria for evaluating JS frameworks - each framework should get a score against the criteria, and the criteria should be weighted to indicate importance for this project: * Open source number of project maintainers and activity level of project commits * Maturity * Size of user base/community * Size of runtime * Quality of documentation * Availability of third party components * Recruiting new team members - availability of developers experienced with this framework * IDE support * Availability of third party documentation * Number of questions and answers on Stack Overflow/online forums * Experience level of framework within our team etc etc add criteria that matter to you.
    • lerpapoo 5y ago
      You forgot * performance *
• croes 5y ago
  It's easy to get rid of the picture, try that with the react components.