3 ms·

> Not having a clue about what a candidate formerly earned means risk for the employer It really doesn't. An employee brings their employer some amount of valu

> Not having a clue about what a candidate formerly earned means risk for the employer It really doesn't. An employee brings their employer some amount of value. The exact amount of value is completely unrelated to that employee's salary at their previous jobs. The _only_ "risk" here is that the employer might not be able to lowball the candidate as much as they possibly could.

WalterBright 5y ago
I'm aware of many people who were hired who brought negative value. A salary history of low wages is a red flag for such. > The exact amount of value is completely unrelated to that employee's salary at their previous jobs. Just try hiring a minimum wage worker as CEO for your next company, and see how well that works out.
- int_19h 5y ago
  That would be a CEO without a golden parachute to bail them out when they run things into the ground... so I wouldn't be surprised if it works out better than average.
- kyralis 5y ago
  > I'm aware of many people who were hired who brought negative value. A salary history of low wages is a red flag for such. Is it really? If someone's bouncing between jobs, doing a terrible job at each of them, why would their salary history be likely to reflect it? A given company might fire them, but lowering someone's pay to indicate poor performance is not common. > Just try hiring a minimum wage worker as CEO for your next company, and see how well that works out. That has nothing to do with what they were paid and everything to do with their experience. No one's discussing not talking about experience.
  - WalterBright 5y ago
    When you work for a company, do you never see a correlation between what people are paid and what they contribute? Really? As for me, I've gone to the boss and said my work XXX was valuable to the company, so I want a raise, and I'd get it. If I hadn't done XXX would I have gotten the raise? Of course not. (Of course, government and union jobs are different, where your pay is based on seniority, your degree, and job category.)

WalterBright 5y ago

I'm aware of many people who were hired who brought negative value. A salary history of low wages is a red flag for such. > The exact amount of value is completely unrelated to that employee's salary at their previous jobs. Just try hiring a minimum wage worker as CEO for your next company, and see how well that works out.

int_19h 5y ago
That would be a CEO without a golden parachute to bail them out when they run things into the ground... so I wouldn't be surprised if it works out better than average.
kyralis 5y ago
> I'm aware of many people who were hired who brought negative value. A salary history of low wages is a red flag for such. Is it really? If someone's bouncing between jobs, doing a terrible job at each of them, why would their salary history be likely to reflect it? A given company might fire them, but lowering someone's pay to indicate poor performance is not common. > Just try hiring a minimum wage worker as CEO for your next company, and see how well that works out. That has nothing to do with what they were paid and everything to do with their experience. No one's discussing not talking about experience.
- WalterBright 5y ago
  When you work for a company, do you never see a correlation between what people are paid and what they contribute? Really? As for me, I've gone to the boss and said my work XXX was valuable to the company, so I want a raise, and I'd get it. If I hadn't done XXX would I have gotten the raise? Of course not. (Of course, government and union jobs are different, where your pay is based on seniority, your degree, and job category.)