3 ms·
+1 for gitea. I've messed with codeberg, sourcehut, gitlab, even fossil (non git version control system, fantastic software but unfortunately everyone uses git)
by betwixthewires 5y ago
+1 for gitea. I've messed with codeberg, sourcehut, gitlab, even fossil (non git version control system, fantastic software but unfortunately everyone uses git) and I've got to say gitea is where it's at. It's the right combination of light and feature dense, could be lighter IMO but it's great.
They're not providers, although gitlab and sourcehut do offer code hosting services, and I'm sure some people are offering paid access to services they host with some of this software.
- rapnie 5y agoCodeberg could be said to be a provider. They are hosting FOSS projects exclusively and contribute to the Gitea project, as that is the forge software they use. They have services like Codeberg Pages and (soon) Codeberg CI. https://codeberg.org https://codeberg.org
- betwixthewires 5y agoI was pretty sure codeberg has their own server software, maybe I'm thinking of something else.